In order to keep the public nuisance dispute information management system up-to-date and lower the occurrence of public nuisance disputes according to the history case analysis, this project has completed several work items as follow: (1) analyzed judicial cases including 6 domestic cases, 3 abroad cases and evaluated reasons of successful and failure compensations of the cases.(2) established the technical advisory group for public nuisance identification and evidence. Up to now, some members of the group were sent out for two times to provide advices in evidence collection and sampling. (3) collected a member list of a 98 expert advisory committee, a mediation committee for each city and county and an EPA adjudication board, and established into the system. (4) held two meetings to revise the standard operation procedures(SOP) of the public nuisance dispute evidence collecting process, and completed the SOP.(5) collected 14 public nuisance dispute related news, in which 9 cases caused soil and groundwater pollution and 2 cases affected human health.(6) held regional seminar in Taipei City, Taichung City and Kaohsiung City.(7) updated and maintained the public nuisance dispute information management system—developed PDA version system.(8) planned public nuisance dispute evidence collection and investigation drill, the subject is about a public nuisance case of a petrochemical plants.(9) held 2012 work review meetings on national public nuisance disputes.

Public Nuisance, Public Nuisance Disputes,;Public Nuisance Appraising